MANDIBULAR SHAPE VARIATION AND ASYMMETRY IN PRAMENKA, AKKARAMAN, AND KANGAL AKKARAMAN SHEEP: A GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC STUDY

Authors

  • Hacer Baş-Ekici Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140 Sivas, Türkiye, hbasekici@cumhuriyet.edu.tr
  • Nedzad Hadžiomerović Department of Basic Veterinary Medicine Sciences, Veterinary Faculty, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Lutfi Takcı* Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, 58140 Sivas, Türkiye, ltakci@cumhuriyet.edu.tr

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-2343-2026

Keywords:

geometric morphometrics, mandible, sheep, fluctuating asymmetry, morphological differentiation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to characterise mandibular shape variation and asymmetry patterns in three sheep breeds from two geographical regions: Pramenka from Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Akkaraman and Kangal Akkaraman from Türkiye. Thirty-four male mandibles (10 Pramenka, 12 Akkaraman, 12 Kangal Akkaraman) were analysed by landmark-based geometric morphometrics, with eleven homologous landmarks digitised on lateral photographs. Generalised Procrustes Analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA), allometric regression, and Procrustes ANOVA were performed in MorphoJ. The first three principal components explained 63.37% of total shape variation. In the PCA morphospace, Akkaraman and Kangal Akkaraman specimens overlapped almost completely, whereas Pramenka formed a clearly separated cluster. DFA confirmed significant shape differences in all pairwise comparisons, with cross-validated classification accuracy of 79.2% between the two Anatolian breeds and 100% for both Pramenka comparisons. Shape differences were most pronounced in the pars incisiva, pars molaris, corpus mandibulae, and ramus mandibulae. Centroid size explained only 2.51% of shape variation (P = 0.3467), indicating no significant allometric effect. Fluctuating asymmetry exceeded directional asymmetry for both size and shape; directional asymmetry in shape nevertheless remained statistically significant, consistent with a degree of masticatory laterality.
Mandibular morphology therefore differs primarily between geographically distant breeds, while the two Anatolian breeds remain morphologically close, and the observed asymmetry patterns point to developmental instability as the principal source. These data provide morphometric reference values for future work on breed differentiation, functional adaptation, and zooarchaeological identification of ovine remains.

References

Akçapınar H. Koyun yetiştiriciliği. Ankara: İsmat Matbaacılık, 2000.

Zeder MA. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: origins, diffusion and impact. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 11597–11604.

Porcu K, Marković B. Catalogue of West Balkan Pramenka sheep breed type. Skopje Zemljodelski Fakultet, 2006.

Avdić R, Hadziomerović N, Tandir F, Bejdić P, Ćutahija V. Analysis of morphometric parameters of the roe deer mandible (Capreolus capreolus) and mandible of the sheep (Ovis aries). Veterinaria 2013; 62: 1–9.

Gündemir O, Duro S, Szara T, et al. Skull variation in different breeds of sheep from Balkan countries. Ann Anat 2023; 249: 152083..

Pérez-Barbería FJ, Gordon IJ. The functional relationship between feeding type and jaw and cranial morphology in ungulates. Oecologia 1999; 118: 157–165.

Lobprise HB, Dodd JR, eds. Wiggs's veterinary dentistry: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.

Bookstein FL. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

O'Higgins P. The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry. J Anat 2000; 197: 103–120.

Slice DE. Modern morphometrics. In: Physical Anthropology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, 2005.

Slice DE. Geometric morphometrics. Annu Rev Anthropol 2007; 36: 261–281.

Özden B. İran küçük bal arısı (Apis florea Fabricius) populasyonlarında geometrik morfometrik analizi. MSc Thesis. Zonguldak: Karaelmas University, Institute of Science, 2008.

Gürbüz I, Aytek AI, Demiraslan Y, et al. Geometric morphometric analysis of cranium of wolf (Canis lupus) and German shepherd dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2020; 26: 525–532.

Pares-Casanova PM, Siddiq AB, Onar V. Cranial size and shape sexual dimorphism in the Kangal dog from Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2020; 44: 396–403

Demiraslan Y, Özgel Ö, Gürbüz I, et al. The mandibles of the Honamli and Hair goat (Capra hircus): a geometric morphometric study. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2021; 68: 321–328.

Ketani MA, Sağsöz H. Sıçanlarda mandibular kondilin histolojik yapısı üzerine cinsiyetin etkilerinin histomorfometrik olarak incelenmesi. Atatürk Univ Vet Bil Derg 2009; 4: 31–38.

Zhou Z, Winkler DE, Fortuny J, Kaiser TM, Marcé-Nogué J. Why rumina-ting ungulates chew sloppily: biomechanics discern a phylogenetic pattern. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0214510.

Demiraslan Y, Demircioğlu İ, Güzel BC. Geometric analysis of mandible using semilandmark in Hamdani and Awassi sheep. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2024; 71: 19–25.

Pares-Casanova PM. Allometric shape variation in Ovis aries mandibles: a digital morphometric analysis. J Morphol Sci 2013; 30: 232–234.

Yalçın H, Kaya MA, Arslan A. Comparative geometrical morphometries on the mandibles of Anatolian wild sheep (Ovis gmelini anatolica) and Akkara-man sheep (Ovis aries). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2010; 16: 55–61.

Goldberg LJ, Gerstner GE. Species-specific morphology of masticatory jaw movements. Behaviour 1994; 128: 229–253.

Özkan E, Boz Doğan İ, Duro S, et al. Geometric morphometric evaluation of mandibles of four sheep breeds: Bardoka, İvesi, Polish Mountain sheep and Turcana. Anat Histol Embryol 2024; 53: e13048.

Boz İ, Manuta N, Jashari T, et al. Mandibular shape variation in different sheep breeds. Research Square 2023 [preprint]. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2936833/v1.

Jashari T, Duro S, Gündemir O, et al. Morphology, morphometry and some aspects of clinical anatomy in the skull and mandible of Sharri sheep. Biologia 2022; 77: 423–433.

Manuta N, Duro S, Szara T, et al. Skull asymmetry in various sheep breeds: directional asymmetry and fluctuating asymmetry. Anat Histol Embryol 2024; 53: e13047.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20

How to Cite

Baş-Ekici, H., Hadžiomerović, N., & Takcı, L. (2026). MANDIBULAR SHAPE VARIATION AND ASYMMETRY IN PRAMENKA, AKKARAMAN, AND KANGAL AKKARAMAN SHEEP: A GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRIC STUDY. Slovenian Veterinary Research, Early View. https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-2343-2026

Issue

Section

Original Research Article