• Asmaa EL-Sayed Kamel Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt;
  • Wafaa EL-Eraky Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt
  • Walaa Abdel Razik Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt
  • Abdallah E. Metwally Department of Nutrition and Clinical Nutrition, Zagazig University, 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt



oil, emulsifier, energy, performance, minerals, broiler


This work was done to investigate the effect of dietary emulsifier supplementation (Lipidol) in different life stages of broilers (Ross 308) with different soybean oil levels with or without a reduced energy diet (-50 Kcal/Kg) on growth performance, digestibility, serum lipid profiles, carcass traits, and some minerals deposition in the whole body and tibia of broilers during a 42-day rearing period. A total of 240 one-day-old chicks were randomly assigned to sixteen experiment groups, three replicates of five birds each. The birds with a 4 × 2 factorial design received either four levels of soybean oil (1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5% of diet) or two levels of energy [recommended energy (control) or reduced energy (RE)]. The results described that dietary addition of an emulsifier to the control group significantly increased (P < 0.05) body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), decreased feed intake, and improve feed conversion ratio (FCR) in all periods except BWG and FCR during the finisher period, which showed non-significant difference. Moreover, the deposition of calcium and phosphorus in the whole body and tibia in all periods was significantly increased. The addition of an emulsifier significantly increased the dressing percent (P < 0.05) and abdominal fat percent (P < 0.0001),whereas there was non-significant difference among all groups in dressing %, intestine, gizzard, liver, and abdominal fat % by interaction, and all carcass traits were not affected by different levels of oil. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) - cholesterol and total cholesterol concentrations also were decreased (P < 0.05) by emulsifier supplementation during all periods. Meanwhile, increased triglyceride levels were detected during starter and finisher periods. Fat and dry matter digestibility was increased (P < 0.05) by emulsifier supplementation in the group fed the lowest oil level. In conclusion, growth performance, digestibility, cholesterol, and bone quality were improved by dietary lipidol supplementation to reduced energy diets to a level that reached the control.


● 1. Alam SM, Khan MA. Poultry farming in Pakistan has developed as an important sub-sector of live-stock. Nuclear Institute of Agriculture Tando Jam, Pakistan 2000; 07–13.

● 2. Ravindran V, Tancharoenrat P, ZaefarianF,et al. Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016; 213:1–21.

● 3. Zosangpuii, Patra AK, Samanta G, et al. Effects of an emulsifier on the performances of Khaki Campbell ducks added with different sources of fats. Front Agric China 2011; 5: 605–11.

● 4. Ashraf M. Use of emulsifiers in high fat level diets of broilers. PhD thesis, Dept Animal, Faculty of Agriculture, AlAzhar University Egypt 2007; 235.

● 5. Meng X, Slominski A, Guenter W. The effect of fat type, carbohydrates, and lipase addition on growth performance and nutrient utilization of young broil-ers fed wheat-based diets. Poult Sci 2004; 83: 1718–27.

● 6. Dierick NA, Decuypere JA. Influence of lipase and/or emulsifier addition on the ileal and fecal nu-trient digestibility in growing pigs fed diets containing 4% animal fat. J Sci Food Agric 2004; 84:1443–50.

● 7. Zosangpuii, Patra AK, Samanta G. Inclusion of an emulsifier to the diets containing different sources of fats on performances of Khaki Campbell ducks. Iran J Vet Res 2015; 16:156–60.

● 8. Upadhaya SD, Lee JS, Jung KJ, et al. Influence of emulsifier blends having different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value on growth performance, nu-trient digestibility, serum lipid profiles, and meat quality of broilers. Poult Sci 2018; 97:255–61.

● 9. Hakansson J. The effect of fat on calcium, phosphorus and magnesium in laying hens. Swed J Agric Res 1975; 5:3–9.

● 10. Meiattini F, Prencipe L, Bardelli F, et al. The 4-hydroxybenzoate/ 4-aminophenazone chromogenic system used in the enzymic determination of serum cholesterol. Clin Chem 1978; 24: 2161–5.

● 11. Bucolo G, David H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by use of enzymes. Clin Chem 1973; 19: 475–82.

● 12. Grove TH. Effect of reagent pH on determina-tion of high-density lipoprptein cholesterol by precip-itation with sodium phosphate-magnesium. Clin Chem 1979; 25:560–4.

● 13. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipo-protein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18:499–502.

● 14. Bauer JD. Clinical laboratory methods “9th end, the C. V. Company Waistline Industrial Missouri 63116. Chapter 33, 1982:555.

● 15. Myers WD, Ludden PA, Nayigihugu V, et al. Technical note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J Anim Sci 2004; 82:179–83.

● 16. A.O.A.C. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. AOAC. International, Gaithersburg, MD. 2004.

● 17. Mc Donald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JF. Animal Nutrition printed and bound in Great Britain by William Clowes (Beccles) limited Beccles and London 1981.

● 18. Danicke S, Simon O, Jeroch H, et al. Effects of dietary fat type, pentosan level and xylanase sup-plementation on digestibility of nutrients and metabo-lizability of energy in male broilers. Arch Tierernahr1999; 52:245–61.

● 19. A.O.A.C. Official methods of analysis. Associa-tion of official analytical chemists. Washington, DC, USA. 1990

● 20. Nation JL, Robinson FA. Concentration of some major and trace elements in honeybee, royal jelly and pollen, determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometer. J Apic Res1971; 10:35–43.

● 21. Zhao PY, Kim IH. Effect of diets with differ-ent energy and lysophospholipids levels on perfor-mance, nutrient metabolism, and body composition in broilers. Poult Sci 2017; 96:1341–7.

● 22. Chen C, Jung B, Kim WK. Effects of lyso-phospholipid on growth performance, carcass yield, intestinal development, and bone quality in broilers. PoultSci2019; 98:3902–13.

● 23. Tan HS, Zulkifli I, Farjam AS, et al. Effect of exogenous emulsifier on growth performance, fat digestibility, apparent metabolisable energy in broiler chickens.J biochem microbial Biotechnol 2016; 4: 7–10.

● 24. Roy A, Haldar S, Mondal S, et al. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broil-er chickens. Vet Med Int. 2010; 2010:262604.

● 25. Melegy T, Khaled NF, El-Bana R, et al. Dietary fortification of a natural biosurfactant, lysolecithin in broiler. Afr J Agric Res 2010; 5:2886–92.

● 26. GuerreiroNeto AC, Pezzato AC, Sartori JR, et al. Emulsifier in broiler diets containing different fat sources. Braz J Poult Sci 2011; 13: 119–25.

● 27. Maertens L, Segers L, Rovers M, et al. The effect of different emulsifiers on fat and energy di-gestibility in broilers. Proceedings of the 19th Euro-pean Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Potsdam, Germany, 26-29 August 2013; pp: 1–4.

● 28. Zhang B, Haitao L, Zhao D, et al. Effect of fat type and lysophosphatidylcholine addition to broiler diets on performance, apparent digestibility of fatty acids, and apparent metabolizable energy content. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2011; 163: 177–84.

● 29. Zampiga M, Meluzzi A, Sirri F. Effect of die-tary supplementation of lysophospholipids on pro-ductive performance, nutrient digestibility and car-cass quality traits of broiler chickens. Ital J Anim Sci 2016; 15: 521–8.

● 30. Wang JP, Zhang ZF, Yan L, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of emulsifier and carbohy-drase on the growth performance, serum cholesterol and breast meat fatty profile of broiler chickens. Anim Sci J 2016; 87:250––56.

● 31. Bontempo V, Comi M, Jiang XR, et al. Evalua-tion of a synthetic emulsifier product supplementa-tion on broiler chicks. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2018; 240:157–64.

● 32. Cho JH, Zhao PY, Kim IH. Effects of emulsi-fier and multi-enzyme in different energy density diet on growth performance, blood profiles, and relative organ weight in broiler chickens. J Agric Sci 2012; 4: 161–8.

● 33. Allahyari-Bake S, Jahanian R. Effects of dietary fat source and supplemental lysophosphatidylcholine on performance, immune responses, and ileal nutri-ent digestibility in broilers fed corn/soybean meal- or corn/wheat/soybean meal-based diets. Poult Sci2017; 96:1149–58.

● 34. Kaczmarek SA, Bochenek M, Samuelsson AC, et al. Effects of glyceryl polyethylene glycol ricinole-ate on nutrient utilization and performance of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr 2015; 69: 285–96.

● 35. Kulkarni RC, Dingore AD, Durge SM, et al. Supplementation of different emulsifiers on perfor-mance of broilers. J Entomol Zool Stud 2019; 7: 25–29.

● 36. Abbas MT, Arif M, Saeed M, et al. Emulsifier effect on fat utilization in broiler chicken. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2016; 11: 158–67.

● 37. Wongsuthavas S, Yuangklang C, Wittayakun S, et al. Dietary soybean oil, but not krabok oil, dimin-ishes abdominal fat deposition in broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2007; 6: 792–5.

● 38. Halda S, Ghosh TK. Nutritional emulsifier sustains performance of broiler fed a low-energy diet – a new approach to alleviate tropical heat stress. 2010. health/articles/nutritional-emulsifiers-sustainsperformance-t1505/p0.htm.

● 39. Dersjant-Li YM, Peisker M. Soybean lecithin in animal nutrition: an unmatched additive. Kraftfutter 2005; 88: 28–34.

● 40. Zaman QU, Mushtaq T, Nawaz H, et al. Effect of varying dietary energy and protein on broiler per-formance in hot climate. Anim Feed Sci Tech2008; 146:302–12.

● 41. Niu ZY, Shi JS, Liu FZ, et al. Effects of dietary energy and protein on growth performance and car-cass quality of broilers during starter phase. Int J Poult Sci 2009; 8:508–11.

● 42. Nagargoje SB, Dhumal MV, Nikam MG, et al. Effect of crude soy lecithin with or without lipase on performance and carcass traits, meat keeping quality and economics of broiler chicken. Int J Livest Res 2016; 6: 46–54.

● 43. Theil PK, Lauridsen C. Interactions between dietary fatty acids and hepatic gene expression in livers of pigs during the weaning period. Livest Sci 2007; 108: 26–9.

● 44. Zhao P, Li H, Hossain M, et al. Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth perfor-mance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2015; 207:190–5.

● 45. Upadhaya S, Park J, Yun H, et al. 283 Role of emulsifier as fat replacer in low-density diet for growing and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:133.

● 46. Gheisar MM, Hosseindoust A, Kim HB, et al. Effects of lysolecithin and sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers. Korean J Poult Sci 2015; 42: 133–7.

● 47. Ferreira AF, Andreotti MO, Carrijo AS, et al. Nutritional value of soybean oil, beef tallow, and their blends of diets for broilers. Acta Sci Anim Sci 2005; 27: 213–9.

● 48. Solis de Los Santos F, Donoghue AM, Ven-kitanarayanan K, et al. Caprylic acid supplemented in feed reduces enteric Campylobacter jejuni colonization in ten-day-old broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2008; 87: 800–4.

● 49. Tohala SH. The relationship between blood lipids profile and performance of broilers fed two types of finisher diets. Iraqi J. Vet. Sci 2010; 24:87–91.

● 50. Park JH, Nguyen DH, Kim IH. Effects of exogenous lysolecithin emulsifier supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood lipid profiles of broiler chickens. J Poult Sci 2018; 55: 190–4.

● 51. Malapure CD, Kawitkar SB, Deshmukh GB, et al. Influence of dietary supplementation of phospho-lipids and lysophospholipids on performance of broilers. Indian J Anim Nutr 2011; 28:316–9.

● 52. Leterrier C, Rose N, Constantin P, et al. Reduc-ing growth rate of broiler chickens with a low energy diet does not improve cortical bone quality. Br Poult Sci 1998; 39:24–30.

● 53. Venalainen E, Valaja J, Jalava T. Effects of die-

tary metabolizable energy, calcium and phosphorus on bone mineralisation, leg weakness and perfor-mance of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2006; 47:301–10.

● 54. Ruttanavut J, Yamauchi K. Growth perfor-mance and histological alterations of intestinal villi in broilers fed dietary mixed minerals. Asian J Anim Sci 2010; 4: 96–106.

● 55. Wohl GR, Loehrke L, Watkins BA, et al. Ef-fects of high-fat diet on mature bone mineral con-tent, structure, and mechanical properties. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 63:74–9.




How to Cite

EL-Sayed Kamel, A., EL-Eraky, W., Razik, W. A., & Metwally, A. E. (2021). IMPACT OF USING DIFFERENT DIETARY LEVELS OF OIL WITH EMULSIFIER ON BROILERS PERFORMANCE, DIGESTIBILITY, AND LIPID PROFILE. Slovenian Veterinary Research, 58(24-Suppl), 413–28.



Original Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)