INCEDENCE OF THERMODURIC ANTIMICROBIAL-RESISTANT Bacillus AND Enterococcus SPECIES IN SOME DAIRY PRODUCTS
Abstract: Livestock meat is considered a potential source of human infection, therefore evaluation of the infection rate with Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) in these animals’ meat is needed for public health protection. Serum and meat samples were collected from slaughtered animals (n=106) (27 sheep, 42 cattle and 37 camels) from slaughterhouses in Aswan Governorate, located in southern Egypt. T. gondii infection status was detected by Latex agglutination test (LAT), microscopic examination and PCR. Our results revealed that the overall prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies among serum samples was 48.1 % using LAT. Male sheep, cattle, and camels had a higher positive percentage (42.9 %, 69.4% and 33.3 %, respectively) than females (40 %, 50 % and 30.8 %, respectively). The infection rate of T. gondii was higher in adult sheep and camels, while it was lower in adult cattle (64.5 %) than in young (72.7 %). There was a high statistically significant difference (P ≤ 0.01) between the animal species using LAT. T. gondii trophozoites were detected microscopically in 47.1 % of meat samples, while T. gondii DNA was detected in 56.9 % by using conventional Polymerase Chain Reaction (cPCR) based B1 gene. There was no significant difference between the results of both microscopy and PCR methods. In conclusion, PCR outperforms LAT in the detection of T. gondii infection and can thus be applied to routine diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in red meat producing animals.
Key words: Aswan; camel ; cattle ; Egypt; LAT; PCR; red meat; sheep; Toxoplasma gondii
~ 1. Gharib AA, Abd El Hamid MI, Yonan EY. Physiological and molecular studies on thermotolerance of Bacillus cereus isolated from some dairy products and fast foods. Zag Vet J 2020;48(4): 354-365.
~ 2. Gharib AA, Abd El-aziz NK, Allam MO. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for detection of toxin genes of Bacillus cereus group isolated from meat and chicken products. Zag Vet J 2020; 48(4): 457-470.
~ 3. Griffiths MW, Phillips JD. Incidence, source, and some properties of psychrotrophic Bacillus sppfound in raw and pasteurized milk. Int J Dairy Technol 2007; 43:62–66.
~ 4. Doyle CJ, Gleeson D, Jordan K, Beresford TP, Ross RP, Fitzgerald GF,Cotter PD. Anaerobic sporeformers and their significance with respect to milk and dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 2014; 197: 77–87.
~ 5. Yacoub SS, Shamsia SM, Awad SA, Ziena HM, Safwat NM. Characterization of aerobic sporeforming bacteria isolated from raw milk, skim milk powder, and UHT milk. Alex. Sci. Exch J 2017; 38: 99–111.
~ 6. Malek R, El-Attar A, Mohamed M, Anwar S, ElSoda M, Béal C. Technological and safety properties display biodiversity among enterococci isolated from two Egyptian cheeses, ‘Ras’ and ‘Domiati’. Int J Food Microbiol 2012; 153: 314–322.
~ 7. Hassan M, Tartor YH, Ashour D, Elmowalid E. Enterococcus faecalis Cell-free supernatant inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida albicans. Zagazig Vet J 2018; 46: 128–135.
~ 8. Mannu L, Paba A, Daga E, Comunian R, Zanetti S, Dupre I, Sechi, LA. Comparison of the incidence of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance between Enterococcus faecium strains of dairy, animal and clinical origin. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 88: 291–304.
~ 9. Clewell DB, Dunny GM. Conjugation and genetic exchange in enterococci 2002. https://doi.org /10.1128/9781555817923.ch7.
~ 10. Slanetz LW, Bartley CH. Numbers of enterococci in water, sewage and feces determined by the membrane filter technique with an improved medium. J Bacteriol 1957; 74:591-5.
~ 11. Chatzigeorgiou KS, Sergentanis TN, Tsiodras S, Hamodrakas SJ, Bagos PG. Phoenix 100 versus Vitek 2 in the identification of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: A comprehensive metaanalysis. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49: 3284–3291.
~ 12. Pincus DH. Microbial identification using the bioMerieux VITEK® 2 System. In: Miller MJ. Ed. Encyclopedia of Rapid Microbiological Methods 2005;1: 1–32.
~ 13. Clinical LS Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Wayne 2012.
~ 14. Kim YJ, Park JH, Seo KH. Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea. Poult Sci 2018; 97: 271–278.
~ 15. Chandra M Subhosh, Viswanath Buddolla, Reddy B Rajasekhar.Cellulolytic enzymes on lignocellulosic substrates in solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger. Indian J Microbiol 2007; 47:323–328.
~ 16. Gundogan N, Avci E .Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cereus in raw milk and dairy products in Turkey. Int J Dairy Technol 2014; 67: 562–569.
~ 17. Alnakip MZ, Quintela-Baluja M, Böhme K, Fernández-No I, Caamaño-Antelo S, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velázquez J. The Immunology of mammary gland of dairy ruminants between healthy and inflammatory conditions. J Vet Med 2014; 2014:659801.
~ 18. Aouadhi C, Maaroufi A, Merji S.Incidence and characterisation of aerobic spore-forming bacteria originating from dairy milk in Tunisia. Int J Dairy Technol 2014; 67: 95–102.
~ 19. Carlin F. Origin of bacterial spores contaminating foods. Food Microbiol 2011; 28: 177–182.
~ 20. Peña E, deAndradeN, Soares N, Alvarenga VO, Junior SR, Granato D, Zuniga A, Sant'Ana A. Modelling Bacillus cereus adhesion on stainless steel surface as affected by temperature, pH, and time. Int Dairy J 2014; 34: 153–158.
~ 21. Hammad AM, Eltahan A, Khalifa E, Abbas NH, Shimamoto T. Toxigenic potential of Bacillus cereusstrains isolated from retail dairy products in Egypt. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2021;18: 655-660.
~ 22. Rukure G, Bester, B.H.. Survival and growth of Bacillus cereus during Gouda cheese manufacturing. Food Control 2001; 12: 31–36.
~ 23. Moschonas G, Lianou A, Nychas GE, Panagou EZ. Spoilage potential of Bacillus subtilis in a neutral-pH dairy dessert. Food Microbiol 2021; 95: 103715.
~ 24. Salehian M, Salehifar E, Esfahanizadeh M, Karimzadeh L, Rezaei R, Molanejad M. Microbial contamination in traditional ice cream and effective factors. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2013; 23: 18-33.
~ 25. Chajęcka-Wierzchowska W, Zadernowska A, García-Solache M. Ready-to-eat dairy products as a source of multidrug-resistant Enterococcus strains: Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. J Dairy Sci 2020; 103: 4068–4077.
~ 26. Fracalanzza SA,Scheidegger EM,Santos PF, Leite PC, Teixeira LM. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of enterococci isolated from poultry meat and pasteurized milk in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102: 853–859.
~ 27. Luna VA, King DS, Gulledge J, Cannons AC, Amuso PT, Cattani J. Susceptibility of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus pseudomycoides and Bacillus thuringiensis to 24 antimicrobials using Sensititre automated microbroth dilution and Etest agar gradient diffusion methods. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 60: 555–567.
~ 28. Chingwaru W, Mpuchane SF, Gashe BA. Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from milk, beef, and chicken and their antibiotic resistance. J Food Prot 2003; 66: 931–936.
~ 29. Teuber M, Meile L, Schwarz F. Acquired antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from food. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1999;76:115-37.
~ 30. Murray BE. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev 1990; 3:46-65.